Anonymous wrote: Easy way to handle is to set up a link to an archive of old forum, so people can look at it. If they want to comment on an old thread, they can copy the post from old, and paste it into a new thread on new. I doubt that there are enough long running threads to justify separate PW hassles.
Bill Sinclair wrote: Anonymous wrote: Easy way to handle is to set up a link to an archive of old forum, so people can look at it. If they want to comment on an old thread, they can copy the post from old, and paste it into a new thread on new. I doubt that there are enough long running threads to justify separate PW hassles. What about the ability to search? Would that justify it?
Bill Sinclair wrote:As you've noticed we have a new web site, which is powered by a great tool to manage many administrative tasks for NARO. As a part of this new tool, we have these forums which we consider a vital part of NARO membership. However, this forum software is incomplete and did not allow us to import our old forums nor does it include many important features like the ability to search. What we've discussed is installing a more powerful forum software with the drawback being that the passwords would not synchronize between the NARO site and the new forums. We want to know if you all are okay with that setup knowing that it might be confusing for many of the members to remember two passwords and when to use each one? Is this an acceptable option or would you prefer that things remain as they are? Thank you in advance for your feedback!
Anonymous wrote:The NARO is a great organization, but this website is very difficult to navigate. I logged on so I could find some current discussion about seismic agreements and leases in Texas and Oklahoma. May I suggest a focus group at the next NARO meeting to talk about what members need from the NARO website?
I would be interested i any discussion on the Utica shale play in Ohio